MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[His_Majesty]

The point that keeps being missed is that listing half a dozen or so names of people who agree with you =/= "the vast majority of historians". I mean, you may in fact be correct - I'm not for a nanosecond saying you are - but you're doing a piss-weak job of demonstrating that. That we now have the names is a good thing and what you've been asked to provide almost all along. It means, as I said, that we can assess their credentials and what you think they are saying.

Well, I don't know what more you want. These are believers and unbelievers alike, that have all devoted most of their lives to this stuff...and the majority of them happen to agree with me.

Don't know what more you want.

---

Also that isn't the Euthyphro Dilemma. Do learn the basics; there may be a test.

I meant Pascal's Wager....hey, I'm human

---

I'm sorry, I only read the first six pages before hrm started out-and-out lieing before skipping here to see him being ridiculously stupid. So I am browsing and not seeing any argument or evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. Just him saying "I provided good evidence he existed!" while everyone else says no he didn't.

Another person that lacks simple reading comprehension skills...I guess you should have read more than just six pages, because if you had, you would have saw that you aren't the only person that lacks those particular skills...there are others on here just like you...that failed to comprehend what "Part 1" means...and that this post was to set the foundation up for the bigger conclusion of the Resurrection as a whole.

Let me just state I actually do think there was a historical person at the beginning of the cult which became Christianity. There were several such figures who started cults in the area at the time. I think that Paul used one of these as the basis for what we today call Christianity.

Welcome to the majority party.

I would like to move past the "Jesus existed" part and come to the evidence that exists for the resurrection. If it has already been presented I apologize, but it doesn't look like it.

We will get there in small steps... not leaps, and bounds.