MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Angrboda]

No. You've asserted that you can demonstrate the historicity of Jesus. In pursuing that intent, you've asserted that the "vast majority" of historians regard his existence as historical. I have asked you for supporting data.

Again, I never said I have stats...I am going by what those that are in the field are saying. Again, this is not saying that just because the majority believes it, it is true...this is saying that the majority of those in the field are persuaded by the sources that I provided...since you guys were attacking the sources.

(emphasis added)

It's possible there is large scale agreement on the historicity of Jesus the man, but I doubt you know that this consensus is based on the sources you provided.