Indeed. One of the themes emerging in Carrier's book on the godboy is that it is the fuckups in the story which most undermine the historicity claims. For an actual person the proponents of the story seem to have only a foggy idea of basic facts.
1. They don't know when he was born.
2. They don't know when he died.
3. They don't know how old he was at death.
You'd expect believers to take better care of their godboy's story.
1. They don't know when he was born.
2. They don't know when he died.
3. They don't know how old he was at death.
You'd expect believers to take better care of their godboy's story.
