(December 3, 2014 at 5:14 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Are...you serious?Yes I...am.
Quote:The "consesual" thing to which was being referred is fuckin sodomy, sex between a man and a man, that drew the destructive ire of God, not the gang of rapists at Lot's door. Man on man sex gets you fireballs, offering your daughter up for a gang of rapists? Meh...We're not told what drew the destructive ire of God. We're shown a bunch of guys trying to rape visitors. They were free to have consensual sex with each other, but they wanted to rape visitors. There were presumably cities in the workd in which there was homosexual activity, but which didn't get destroyed. So, your inference that the judgment was merely about consensual homosexual activity isn't well supported.
Quote:And I don't care what sort of relativistic cultural justification you want to bring in.Why not? Do you believe that your moral judgments are true and correct, and other people's aren't?
