RE: Rape in the Bible
December 8, 2014 at 1:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2014 at 1:05 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(December 8, 2014 at 12:58 pm)alpha male Wrote:(December 8, 2014 at 12:47 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Yes, it's demonstrably more effective. It's not "better" in any sort of cosmic justice objectively-ordained-by-a-cosmic-jury sense, it's better because it works.Whether it's demonstrable is irrelevant. Even if it works at "creating functioning, safe, stable, and efficient societies," it's still just opinion that such societies are morally good things. Someone else could note that humans in such societies are damaging the earth and so opine that such systems are immoral.
No matter how many levels you take it to, in the end you'll still end up with an opinion.
(December 8, 2014 at 12:50 pm)LastPoet Wrote: It is many orders of magnitude better than the christian bullshit, Johnny. If morality was a school test, secular morality would get a B-, but christian morality woud get a well rounded F.Depends on who's grading the test.
(December 8, 2014 at 12:50 pm)LastPoet Wrote: You are leaking dogma trough the side of your mouth, mind you and clean that up.Dogma? No, I'm arguing on the side of objective morality...a position that many atheists also hold. Well, until it turn around and bites them...
I'm not sure what your idea of an 'opinion' is, but a model or system that is supported by data is not a simple guess or opinion, and it's strange that you're so desperate to paint any sort of non-absolute morality as "just your opinion", seeing as your morality (I would assume) comes by flat assertion from the 'opinions' of a single source.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson