RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2)
December 14, 2014 at 2:38 pm
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2014 at 3:00 pm by His_Majesty.)
(December 13, 2014 at 5:42 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Oh...So all you have is a baseless, illogical ad hoc explanations.
Read what you said, and what I said...and if it doesn't make sense to you, read again..and after about 20 tries, if you still don't understand what was said to you, if you can't quite comprehend...then go back to any elementary school...possibly second grade english class, and I want you to learn, along with the students, how to comprehend what you read.
And if you still don't quite get it, we will have to figure something else out.
(December 13, 2014 at 5:42 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Wouldn't an omniscient god know that I will be unconvinced by such flawed and fallacious arguments, such as you offer?
Romans 1:20
20 "For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."
Never mind my flawed and fallacious arguments, according to God's word, you can draw the conclusion that he exists based on what has been made, so you are basically "without excuse"...so don't listen to me, listen to him...and if you think he is speaking fallaciously...thennn hey
(December 14, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Spooky Wrote: Because everybody either became Christians, or became corpses. The Crusades were a bloody plague.
Nonsense. There were no Crusades in first century Palestine...and far from Crusades, the Christians were the one's being persecuted...so it was a BAD to be a Christian, and the word still spread.
(December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm)Cato Wrote: Here, go learn something.
Naw, I'm straight. I don't need to read that crap. Go slang links to someone else.
(December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm)Cato Wrote: I find it pathetic that a Christian doesn't know the history of his own religion.
Oh, I agree...to bad that shit don't apply to me.
(December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm)Cato Wrote: I even linked a Christian book outlet so no bullshit excuses. In case you want to say you can't afford it, I read it after checking it out from my local library.
http://www.christianbook.com/christianit.../pd/118695
Damn dude, you wasted all of that time getting information for me that I won't read...and however many seconds/minutes you wasted on it, you will never get back.
I actually feel bad for you, bruh.
(December 14, 2014 at 1:49 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Yes, you will. Preaching and proselytising is not only irrelevant to the case you're trying to make, to the point it's actually hurting your case, it's also rude and downright insulting. You don't want to get banned; you stop doing the things that violate the Rules. Especially when called out on such behaviour.
Dude, I took heed to what you said and you are still bitching? You advised me to do something, I considered it, agreed to it, and said I'll do it..yet you reply by making a more stronger point than you made BEFORE I agreed to it??
Am I in the twilight zone??
(December 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: I object to this thread. Case 1 was never resolved, and a convincing case was never presented let alone defended.
This thread is effectively spam.
Who determines whether or not it was solved? Is this a democracy or dictatorship?
