RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2)
December 14, 2014 at 5:44 pm
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2014 at 5:47 pm by His_Majesty.)
(December 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Strider Wrote: Sweeping blanket statement is sweeping. On a large scale, perhaps many Christians agree with you. On a larger scale, the number of other people not prescribing to your particular brand of dogma is even larger. So on a larger scale, more people disagree with you.
This would be an excellent point if it wasn't for the fact that I was talking about the two worldviews of atheism and Christianity, you know, one of which I hold, and the other of which he holds.
But see, I know you were so hell bent on wanting to jump into the conversation without paying attention to the itty bitty details like that...the kind of guy that would sign the contract without reading the fine print first...those small itsy bitsy words that are so tiny yet they mean so much...shit like that.
(December 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Strider Wrote: So in other words, what I am saying is...fuck your pizza analogy.
You've already demonstrated how someone can jump into a conversation without taking the time to comprehend exactly what the hell is going on...so just go back to wherever you came from and we can pretend as if this intellectual spanking never happened.
(December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I didn't say "knowledge", dumbass.
Reading comprehension...I said you made a CLAIM of knowledge when you stated that God didn't say it or whatever it was that you said.
Read comprehension people.
(December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I'm not a gnostic atheist. I just find your particular conception of deity to be hysterically childish and so full of internal contradictions that it collapses under its own weight.
I find the concept of naturalism virtually impossible.