RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 4:43 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 4:19 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:
What you have there is suppose, suppose, suppose. If you have to: suppose away all the obvious problems by inventing eyewitness sources even though your authors don't claim them; suppose extraordinarily long lived authors to make them contemporaries, which still does not make their accounts contemporary; assume events must of happened when there is no evidence for them on the grounds that finding evidence would be unlikely; assume that a dead man spent 40 days explaining it all because a non-contemporary source says a dead man visited for 40 days----- then you don't have any evidence. And if you don't have evidence, you don't have proof.
What you have is faith. Fine with me. Have faith. But don't come bleating about how it proves anything, because it doesn't.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.