RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2014 at 5:15 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(December 15, 2014 at 4:44 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 15, 2014 at 3:46 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: When you find a successful forum that operates as a democracy let me know. You signed up, you agree with our enforcement of the rules by default.
You don't like it? You know where the door is. This thread will be merged with the other one because basically they're the same thread. There was no convincing case presented or defended in part 1. And as such continuing with the delusion that there was is spam. And that's the end of the conversation.
Yeah, continue to flex your muscles and play God of the forum. Not everyone with power is fit to rule.
'Flex my muscles'? On an internet forum? I'm enforcing the rules that you have agreed to abide by, and are there to keep the forum running efficiently. You got a problem with it? Message the staff.
Just because you got slapped down by the rules and us doesn't mean you have a right to keep crying about it like a petulant child. Stop being stupid, or leave. You've contributed nothing to the forum thus far except 80+ pages of utter nonsense. Weirdest thing is you think this is somehow different from the same old tired, debunked shit that's graced this and numerous other places of discussion for hundreds of years. It's not. It's tiresome. And if you start another thread with the delusion that you've somehow presented something that you've then defended then we'll escalate to more than just merging threads.
Got it?