RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 12:22 am
(December 15, 2014 at 11:13 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 15, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Jenny A Wrote: You just gave a practical example of why a negative cannot be proven.
You can't prove there aren't invisible purple nothings on the other side of the sun.
"Nothing" cannot be an entity. So what you've just said is nonsense.
(December 15, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Jenny A Wrote: But that doesn't mean they do exist. Your god is an invisible purple nothing.
"Nothing" does not have a color. So what you've just said is nonsense.
Ah, but you just don't understand. The invisible purple nothings are so powerful, they can be invisible and purple at the same time and they can be something and nothing at the same time. Isn't that amazing? And the proof that they exist lies in how absurd it is, because no one would make up anything so absurd!
If that sounds ridiculous to you, you now understand how "The Trinity" sounds to us. Jesus is fully human and fully divine, one with his father as part of the same god and yet they are separate persons at the same time, same god being in three separate persons.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
