MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Natachan]

The more I read the more I become convinced that H_M is trying to do something impossible. He seems to think that accepting that tree was a historical preacher Jesus means accepting a mythical god-man. In fact it isn't that a preacher like Jesus couldn't have existed, the problem is that too many existed. Even limiting it to people Pilate killed that's still too many (Pilate was a despot, as described by his contemporaries).

Then he tries the ridiculous plan of trying to argue the reliability of the gospels. And added to that when confronted he resorts to ad hominums and arguments that are lifted whole from other apologetics.

He is starting to bore. Even this pile of excrement has lost its lulz value.