MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[His_Majesty]

I don't think he's serious. I think he's trying to play the old Theist's game of "you don't know everything; so how do you know Yahweh isn't in some alternate dimension" or variations on that theme of shifting the burden of proof. His is just a lame, poorly thought out variation.

Yeah, it is a game...it is a game of pointing out flaws in atheists reasoning. You don't know if God is behind the sun...you don't even know if there is a 6'7 guy in China named "Fei Long". So you can't conclusively say "there is no 6'7 guy in China named "Fei Long".

And it wasn't poorly thought out either...all I had to do was pick a location that I am pretty confident you've never been, which is behind the sun that was richly thought out.

I believe we live in a natural universe best understood b y science and reason.

The problem is you would have to use science to explain shit like life from nonlife, and consciousness from matter...and I don't think your or anyone else can do that.

I don't have to prove the supernatural isn't real.

You can't even prove that life can come from nonlife naturally...prove that first and then worry about the supernatural...don't take a course in calculus before you've taken algebra.

There are levels to this shit

The fact that all supernatural claims have failed to meet their burden of proof is sufficient to fall within the bounds of rational skepticism.

Subjective. I think supernatural claims meet their burden of proof...to me, but heyyy..I aint mad at cha'.