MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: January 26, 2025, 9:24 am

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

~~His_Majesty~~ Offline

Banned
Religious Views: Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior

Posts: 322
Threads: 3
Joined: November 2, 2014
Reputation: 1

#1016

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

(December 16, 2014 at 4:05 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Are you mentally ill? You can't leave it alone can you? You're certainly one the stupidest people that's ever been on here, and that's saying a lot considering the dregs we've had here before. 'There is no fossil Record' and not knowing what the other side of the sun is like? I mean LOL. Come the fuck along?

I've repeatedly told you to stop being stupid. But it seems you are incapable. Very well.

Pass me one of those cigars, Fidel. I want to fire one up. Cool Shades

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 8:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 21, 2014 at 8:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 21, 2014 at 8:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 11:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 21, 2014 at 9:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by ManMachine - November 21, 2014 at 9:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 21, 2014 at 10:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:10 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 22, 2014 at 5:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 11:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 11:46 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 25, 2014 at 7:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 26, 2014 at 1:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by ManMachine - November 23, 2014 at 4:52 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 9:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 9:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 10:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 10:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 12:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 10:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 1:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 3:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 24, 2014 at 8:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 11:59 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 11:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 2:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 7:02 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 26, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 12:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 1:23 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 29, 2014 at 1:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 29, 2014 at 1:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 5:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 1:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 1:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 29, 2014 at 11:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 29, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 29, 2014 at 11:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 12:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 12:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 12:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 6:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 10:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 2, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 4:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 10:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 11:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 3, 2014 at 12:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 3, 2014 at 10:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - December 6, 2014 at 10:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 2, 2014 at 4:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 3, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 3, 2014 at 1:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 3, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 3, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 5, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 3, 2014 at 2:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 1, 2014 at 11:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 5:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 6:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 1, 2014 at 6:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 4:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 3:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - November 30, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 9:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 8:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 8:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 11:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 22, 2014 at 3:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 10:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 22, 2014 at 12:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 1:40 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 22, 2014 at 1:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 22, 2014 at 9:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by MitchBenn - November 21, 2014 at 10:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 21, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - November 21, 2014 at 10:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 21, 2014 at 10:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 21, 2014 at 10:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 10:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 10:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 21, 2014 at 10:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Silver - November 21, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 21, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 21, 2014 at 11:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 22, 2014 at 12:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by atheism is illogical - November 28, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 28, 2014 at 6:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Whateverist - November 28, 2014 at 10:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 12:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:35 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 3:12 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 12:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KUSA - November 22, 2014 at 1:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - November 22, 2014 at 2:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 22, 2014 at 5:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 10:56 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 10:57 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by coldwx - November 22, 2014 at 11:11 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 24, 2014 at 9:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 11:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 22, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 12:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 22, 2014 at 1:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 23, 2014 at 6:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 23, 2014 at 8:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 22, 2014 at 2:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 22, 2014 at 4:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 22, 2014 at 7:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 4:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Simon Moon - November 22, 2014 at 6:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 22, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 22, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 10:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 12:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 5:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 22, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 22, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 22, 2014 at 9:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 22, 2014 at 11:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 23, 2014 at 9:06 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - November 23, 2014 at 10:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 11:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 4:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 4:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 23, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 6:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 6:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 7:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 8:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 23, 2014 at 8:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 23, 2014 at 8:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 23, 2014 at 8:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 23, 2014 at 9:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 8:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 23, 2014 at 8:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 23, 2014 at 8:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 24, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 23, 2014 at 9:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 23, 2014 at 9:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 23, 2014 at 9:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 23, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 5:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 24, 2014 at 7:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 24, 2014 at 8:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 24, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 12:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 24, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 24, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 8:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 11:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 8:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 9:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cato - November 24, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 8:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 24, 2014 at 7:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - November 24, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 7:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 7:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 24, 2014 at 7:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 7:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 24, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - November 24, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 7:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 8:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2014 at 8:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 25, 2014 at 3:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 24, 2014 at 8:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 24, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 24, 2014 at 8:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 6:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 8:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - November 24, 2014 at 9:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Zen Badger - November 25, 2014 at 4:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 9:33 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 9:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 4:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 25, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 2:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 7:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 25, 2014 at 7:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 26, 2014 at 12:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 2:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 12:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - November 30, 2014 at 8:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 29, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Grandizer - November 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 25, 2014 at 5:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 8:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 25, 2014 at 8:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 9:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 25, 2014 at 9:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 11:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 12:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 3:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 2:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 26, 2014 at 3:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 26, 2014 at 3:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 3:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 3:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 3:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 12:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 25, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 25, 2014 at 12:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 1:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 25, 2014 at 2:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 3:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 4:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 25, 2014 at 11:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 25, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 2:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 2:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - November 25, 2014 at 2:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mister Agenda - November 25, 2014 at 3:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 25, 2014 at 3:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 3:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - November 25, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 25, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - November 25, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - November 25, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 25, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 25, 2014 at 7:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 8:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 25, 2014 at 8:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 8:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 9:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 25, 2014 at 9:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 25, 2014 at 9:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 25, 2014 at 11:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2014 at 11:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 1:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 2:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 9:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 26, 2014 at 8:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 26, 2014 at 10:08 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 11:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 12:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 26, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - November 26, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 26, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 26, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 3:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 29, 2014 at 2:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 30, 2014 at 10:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 1, 2014 at 12:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 1, 2014 at 10:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 1, 2014 at 10:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 1, 2014 at 10:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 1, 2014 at 10:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 1:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 2, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 2:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 3:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 2, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 1, 2014 at 6:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - November 26, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 26, 2014 at 10:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 26, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 26, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 28, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ravenshire - November 26, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Grand Nudger - November 28, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 28, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 28, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Smaug - November 28, 2014 at 6:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 7:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 28, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 28, 2014 at 11:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 1:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 2:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 29, 2014 at 2:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 29, 2014 at 4:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 9:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 1:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 29, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 3:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 29, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2014 at 6:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 29, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 9:31 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by vorlon13 - November 29, 2014 at 10:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - November 29, 2014 at 10:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 1:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 3:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 29, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 6:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 29, 2014 at 6:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 29, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 29, 2014 at 11:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 29, 2014 at 11:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 30, 2014 at 12:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - November 30, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 12:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 30, 2014 at 1:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - November 30, 2014 at 2:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 29, 2014 at 11:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 1:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - November 30, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 10:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - November 30, 2014 at 10:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - November 30, 2014 at 10:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 30, 2014 at 3:29 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - November 30, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - November 30, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Lemonvariable72 - November 30, 2014 at 2:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - November 30, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - November 30, 2014 at 3:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 3:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - November 30, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - November 30, 2014 at 6:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - November 30, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - November 30, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - November 30, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 12:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 12:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 1, 2014 at 9:45 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 1, 2014 at 10:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 1, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 1, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 1, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 1, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 1, 2014 at 1:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 1, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 2:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 1, 2014 at 5:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 1, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 8:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 1, 2014 at 9:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pigsworld - December 6, 2014 at 1:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 10:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 1, 2014 at 10:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 12:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 2, 2014 at 5:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 5:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 10:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 10:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 11:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 12:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 2, 2014 at 2:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 12:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 1:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 2, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Anomalocaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 1:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 2, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 2, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 2, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Esquilax - December 2, 2014 at 6:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 2, 2014 at 7:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 2, 2014 at 10:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 2, 2014 at 6:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 2, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 2, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 2, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 2, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 2, 2014 at 7:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 2, 2014 at 10:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KUSA - December 2, 2014 at 11:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 3, 2014 at 12:09 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 2, 2014 at 11:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 3, 2014 at 1:52 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 3, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 3, 2014 at 10:14 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Angrboda - December 3, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 3, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 6:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 3, 2014 at 9:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 7:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 4, 2014 at 9:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Exian - December 3, 2014 at 6:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 3, 2014 at 6:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 3, 2014 at 9:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 3, 2014 at 7:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Natachan - December 3, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 3, 2014 at 7:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 3, 2014 at 9:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 3, 2014 at 9:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 12:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 2:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 3:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 4, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 1:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 4, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 4, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 4, 2014 at 9:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 4, 2014 at 9:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 4, 2014 at 9:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 4, 2014 at 10:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 5, 2014 at 12:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 5, 2014 at 12:40 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 5, 2014 at 2:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 5, 2014 at 2:51 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 8:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 9:05 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 5:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 6:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 8:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 6, 2014 at 9:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 9:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jackalope - December 6, 2014 at 10:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:13 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Ryantology - December 6, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 7, 2014 at 11:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 7, 2014 at 11:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 7, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:41 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 2:43 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:24 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 7, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 5, 2014 at 2:56 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 5, 2014 at 3:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 10:04 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Mudhammam - December 5, 2014 at 3:53 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 6, 2014 at 9:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 12:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 6, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 6, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 6, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by KevinM1 - December 6, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - December 6, 2014 at 6:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 6, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by His_Majesty - December 6, 2014 at 7:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by LastPoet - December 6, 2014 at 6:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 6, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 6, 2014 at 8:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 11:36 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:42 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 11:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 11:46 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 7, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 12:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 12:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 12:09 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 3:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 7, 2014 at 7:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 9:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Jenny A - December 7, 2014 at 9:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 7, 2014 at 6:15 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 7, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by pocaracas - December 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 7, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 7, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 5:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 7, 2014 at 7:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 7, 2014 at 8:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 2:30 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 6:39 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 9:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 8, 2014 at 9:10 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 8, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 8, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 5:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 8, 2014 at 5:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Crossless1 - December 8, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 8, 2014 at 5:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 7:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by The Valkyrie - December 8, 2014 at 7:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 8, 2014 at 9:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 9, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by abaris - December 9, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Minimalist - December 8, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by Cyberman - December 8, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 9, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by FatAndFaithless - December 9, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by DeistPaladin - December 9, 2014 at 5:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 9, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by robvalue - December 10, 2014 at 2:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 10, 2014 at 9:23 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) - by dyresand - December 10, 2014 at 11:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 10:01 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 10:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:11 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 10:36 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 10:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 10:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 15, 2014 at 10:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Anomalocaris - December 15, 2014 at 10:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 10:57 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 10:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 12:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 15, 2014 at 1:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 1:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 3:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 2:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 1:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 15, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 15, 2014 at 4:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 2:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 15, 2014 at 3:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 4:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 15, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 12:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 5:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 8:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 6:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 6:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 6:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 15, 2014 at 7:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 16, 2014 at 12:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 16, 2014 at 12:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 2:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 15, 2014 at 7:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 8:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 15, 2014 at 8:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 9:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 9:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 15, 2014 at 8:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 9:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 9:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 9:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 10:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 15, 2014 at 10:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 11:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 10:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 11:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 2:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 3:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:20 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Ryantology - December 16, 2014 at 8:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 8:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 8:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 4:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 9:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:36 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 4:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 5:08 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 6:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 16, 2014 at 10:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 16, 2014 at 5:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 5:40 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 16, 2014 at 6:03 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 6:47 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 8:09 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 8:18 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 9:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 9:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 16, 2014 at 10:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 11:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 16, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 12:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 12:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 16, 2014 at 12:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 12:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 16, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 1:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 1:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 1:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 2:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 16, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 16, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 16, 2014 at 2:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 2:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 2:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 16, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 3:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 3:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by YahwehIsTheWay - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 6:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 16, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 7:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 3:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 3:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 16, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 6:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 7:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 7:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 16, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 16, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 7:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 16, 2014 at 7:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 16, 2014 at 11:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 11:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 1:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 17, 2014 at 1:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 3:02 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 5:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 17, 2014 at 11:40 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 12:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 9:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 17, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 11:55 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 1:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 17, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 17, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 17, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 2:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 17, 2014 at 5:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 17, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 18, 2014 at 8:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 18, 2014 at 4:35 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 18, 2014 at 7:25 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 18, 2014 at 7:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 18, 2014 at 1:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 18, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 18, 2014 at 3:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 12:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 1:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 19, 2014 at 1:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 2:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 3:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 6:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 6:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 19, 2014 at 7:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 19, 2014 at 7:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 3:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 19, 2014 at 3:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 4:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 19, 2014 at 4:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 19, 2014 at 4:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 4:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 19, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 7:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 7:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Losty - December 21, 2014 at 1:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Losty - December 21, 2014 at 1:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 19, 2014 at 8:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 19, 2014 at 8:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 19, 2014 at 8:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 7:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 1:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 3:18 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 21, 2014 at 6:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 20, 2014 at 1:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 11:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 12:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 12:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 20, 2014 at 12:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 12:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 20, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 20, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 1:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 20, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 20, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 3:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Grand Nudger - December 20, 2014 at 3:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 3:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 20, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 4:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 5:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 20, 2014 at 5:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 2:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 11:42 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 12:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 21, 2014 at 1:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 5:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 22, 2014 at 4:12 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 1:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 21, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 20, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 20, 2014 at 11:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 20, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 21, 2014 at 4:10 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 12:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 12:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 1:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Alex K - December 21, 2014 at 1:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 3:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 3:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 3:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 3:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 4:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 21, 2014 at 6:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 7:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 3:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 1:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 2:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 10:08 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 4:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 21, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 4:59 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 22, 2014 at 4:58 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 4:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 21, 2014 at 5:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 21, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 21, 2014 at 5:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 10:12 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 3:59 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 22, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 2:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 22, 2014 at 6:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 7:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 1:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 22, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 10:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 2:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 2:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 22, 2014 at 3:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 3:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 22, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 22, 2014 at 6:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 6:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 23, 2014 at 5:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 21, 2014 at 5:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 21, 2014 at 9:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 21, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 6:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 7:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 9:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 9:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 9:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 9:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 9:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 21, 2014 at 10:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 12:19 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 22, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 22, 2014 at 1:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 21, 2014 at 10:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 10:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 10:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 21, 2014 at 11:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:02 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 21, 2014 at 6:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 7:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 21, 2014 at 11:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 12:03 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 1:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:15 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:56 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 4:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 9:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:23 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 22, 2014 at 10:31 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 22, 2014 at 10:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:28 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 10:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 10:52 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 10:58 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:04 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 11:17 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:56 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 12:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 12:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 11:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 11:07 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:19 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by ThomM - December 22, 2014 at 11:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 22, 2014 at 10:49 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:08 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 11:20 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 11:30 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 11:57 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 11:59 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 12:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 22, 2014 at 12:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 1:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 12:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 22, 2014 at 12:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 12:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 1:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 2:57 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 3:39 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:15 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 3:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 22, 2014 at 3:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 22, 2014 at 4:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 22, 2014 at 4:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 4:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 4:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 4:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 22, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 22, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 6:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 6:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 5:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 22, 2014 at 9:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 5:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 22, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 5:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 22, 2014 at 5:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 22, 2014 at 6:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 7:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 22, 2014 at 7:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 22, 2014 at 7:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 22, 2014 at 11:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 22, 2014 at 11:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Elskidor - December 23, 2014 at 1:29 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 1:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 23, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 2:11 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 2:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 23, 2014 at 3:53 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 5:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:26 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 11:47 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 23, 2014 at 1:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 5:22 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 11:13 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:32 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 11:43 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 23, 2014 at 11:45 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 11:53 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 12:00 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 3:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by KevinM1 - December 23, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 23, 2014 at 4:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 23, 2014 at 3:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 23, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 23, 2014 at 3:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 23, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 23, 2014 at 4:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 23, 2014 at 4:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 23, 2014 at 9:38 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - January 12, 2015 at 5:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 30, 2014 at 10:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - January 12, 2015 at 5:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - January 12, 2015 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - January 12, 2015 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm

The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 11, 2014 at 10:25 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Neo-Scholastic - December 11, 2014 at 10:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 11, 2014 at 10:46 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 12:08 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 12, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 12:28 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 12, 2014 at 12:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 12:39 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 1:07 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 12, 2014 at 1:38 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 1:42 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 2:06 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 4:25 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Losty - December 12, 2014 at 4:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 4:34 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 12, 2014 at 6:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Grand Nudger - December 12, 2014 at 9:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 12, 2014 at 9:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 9:50 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 9:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 12, 2014 at 9:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 9:59 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 12, 2014 at 10:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Natachan - December 12, 2014 at 1:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 6:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 12, 2014 at 6:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 12, 2014 at 6:54 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 12, 2014 at 7:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Mystical - December 12, 2014 at 7:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 12, 2014 at 7:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 12, 2014 at 7:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 8:10 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 12, 2014 at 8:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 12, 2014 at 8:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 12, 2014 at 10:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 13, 2014 at 12:55 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 13, 2014 at 1:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 1:15 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 13, 2014 at 1:45 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 13, 2014 at 6:16 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 6:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 13, 2014 at 8:27 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 13, 2014 at 8:54 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 13, 2014 at 8:58 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 9:03 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 13, 2014 at 9:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 10:32 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 13, 2014 at 3:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Whateverist - December 13, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 4:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 13, 2014 at 5:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 13, 2014 at 5:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Simon Moon - December 13, 2014 at 9:59 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 13, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 12:01 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 14, 2014 at 12:21 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 2:00 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 14, 2014 at 8:37 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 9:21 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 1:23 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 1:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 1:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 14, 2014 at 1:49 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - December 14, 2014 at 2:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 2:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:26 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 14, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 14, 2014 at 2:33 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 2:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 14, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 3:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 3:45 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 3:47 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 4:13 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:20 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:24 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 4:27 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:28 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 14, 2014 at 4:29 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 4:36 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 14, 2014 at 4:38 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 4:42 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 14, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 14, 2014 at 4:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 4:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:02 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 5:14 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Strider - December 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 14, 2014 at 5:44 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 14, 2014 at 5:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 5:52 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Strider - December 14, 2014 at 6:06 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 14, 2014 at 6:16 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 14, 2014 at 6:57 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 14, 2014 at 7:01 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 14, 2014 at 7:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 7:18 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 1:43 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 1:48 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 1:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 2:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 6:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 15, 2014 at 6:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 9:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thor - December 15, 2014 at 9:52 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thor - December 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 2:41 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 4:43 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:47 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 6:39 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 3:16 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 15, 2014 at 4:40 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 15, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 5:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 10:48 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 15, 2014 at 3:17 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 3:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 15, 2014 at 5:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cato - December 15, 2014 at 10:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 16, 2014 at 4:05 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 15, 2014 at 5:12 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 6:14 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 4:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:54 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 4:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 4:58 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2014 at 5:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 5:17 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by abaris - December 15, 2014 at 7:44 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 7:47 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 15, 2014 at 8:18 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 8:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 5:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cato - December 15, 2014 at 5:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 6:09 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 15, 2014 at 11:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 15, 2014 at 11:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:11 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:22 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by FatAndFaithless - December 16, 2014 at 1:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 1:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by JonDarbyXIII - December 16, 2014 at 1:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 9:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 16, 2014 at 10:22 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Silver - December 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 17, 2014 at 2:29 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 2:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by LastPoet - December 17, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 17, 2014 at 2:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 2:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 19, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 3:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 4:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 19, 2014 at 6:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 8:01 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 11:38 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 1:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 3:19 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:24 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:37 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 3:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 21, 2014 at 3:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:06 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by abaris - December 20, 2014 at 11:48 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Strider - December 20, 2014 at 11:51 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 20, 2014 at 12:06 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 20, 2014 at 12:46 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 4:44 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Tonus - December 20, 2014 at 5:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 5:55 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 3:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:04 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 5:26 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 2:48 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 17, 2014 at 2:34 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 2:21 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 19, 2014 at 2:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by downbeatplumb - December 19, 2014 at 2:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Esquilax - December 19, 2014 at 2:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jenny A - December 17, 2014 at 3:01 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 18, 2014 at 2:54 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by rexbeccarox - December 18, 2014 at 3:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Cyberman - December 18, 2014 at 2:14 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 18, 2014 at 2:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 17, 2014 at 3:05 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:13 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:25 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:31 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 5:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 5:45 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Crossless1 - December 17, 2014 at 5:49 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by dyresand - December 17, 2014 at 5:53 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 6:20 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 17, 2014 at 6:30 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Jackalope - December 17, 2014 at 6:32 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by The Valkyrie - December 18, 2014 at 2:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 12:36 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 19, 2014 at 12:50 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 19, 2014 at 3:41 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:10 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 19, 2014 at 6:56 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 12:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by pocaracas - December 20, 2014 at 1:03 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 2:33 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:07 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 21, 2014 at 4:24 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:17 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Free - December 21, 2014 at 6:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 6:42 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 19, 2014 at 4:02 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 20, 2014 at 7:09 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Thumpalumpacus - December 21, 2014 at 2:37 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 2:35 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 15, 2014 at 8:23 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by His_Majesty - December 16, 2014 at 12:33 pm

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 16, 2014 at 12:58 pm

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by robvalue - December 15, 2014 at 8:49 am

RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Fidel_Castronaut - December 15, 2014 at 9:46 am

RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by Minimalist - December 15, 2014 at 11:43 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ?	JJoseph	52	4866	June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm Last Post: arewethereyet
	The power of Christ...	zwanzig	60	7063	August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm Last Post: Bucky Ball
	Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan	Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric	36	9704	December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am Last Post: LinuxGal
	Creating Christ	JML	26	4234	September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm Last Post: Jehanne
	So has Christ returned	TheClearCleanStuff	31	4606	May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm Last Post: Fake Messiah
	CHRIST THE KICKER……	BrianSoddingBoru4	15	1798	January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am Last Post: brewer
	CHRIST THE KILLER.....	ronedee	31	4308	December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm Last Post: Ferrocyanide
	Why I believe in Jesus Christ	Ai Somoto	20	3654	June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm Last Post: Nay_Sayer
	In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation?	GrandizerII	159	22080	November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am Last Post: Abaddon_ire
	Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ'	zebo-the-fat	11	2576	December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm Last Post: Angrboda

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me