MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Esquilax]

Not that the rest of your constant switching between whining and desperate, compensatory grandstanding isn't worth commenting on, but are you actually under the impression that the roflol emoticon this bulletin board platform provides plays a substantial role in the efficacy of your arguments?

That says a lot about the intellectual content of your posts.

Sometimes the goold ole "LOL" or "LMAO" just aint good enough. I need animation.

Alternatively, you could try giving a substantive, justified answer, and not resort to endless, baseless mockery.

I am about as indoctrinated with Christian theism as you people are with Darwinian evolution.

Two things: one your ignorance is showing again. "Darwinian" evolution has long been superseded by modern synthesis, that encompasses aspects of biology and population genetics that Darwin simply could not have known about.

Secondly, you can't be indoctrinated into a thing that's demonstrably true, which modern evolutionary theory is. Your sole response there has been to attempt to redefine what evolution is, based solely on your own ignorance of the topic, and additional definitions that you haven't established as reliable or applicable to science. But your unwillingness to use scientific definitions in a scientific discussion is not our problem, and it's not a problem for evolutionary theory.