RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 19, 2014 at 6:24 pm
(December 19, 2014 at 5:59 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm)Esquilax Wrote: The first thing he does is start talking about "cosmic evolution," which... is not evolution. So I think the issue isn't that Kent is effective at what he does, but that he and you share the same problem of thinking that you get to redefine what evolution is to fit the agenda you want to push.
The video is damn near two hours long and thats all you have to say???
Since what he says in the first minute reveals he doesn't know what evolution is, why would anyone need to listen further. But if you really must have a longer rebuttal, you can find hours and hours of it here:
You'll find plenty of coverage of Hovind.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.