RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 19, 2014 at 7:21 pm
(December 19, 2014 at 5:59 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 19, 2014 at 4:45 pm)Esquilax Wrote: The first thing he does is start talking about "cosmic evolution," which... is not evolution. So I think the issue isn't that Kent is effective at what he does, but that he and you share the same problem of thinking that you get to redefine what evolution is to fit the agenda you want to push.
The video is damn near two hours long and thats all you have to say???
Have you read his "PhD" "dissertation".
I have.
The man is a disingenuous idiot. I've also seen enough of his video material to be sufficiently convinced that viewing any more of it would be a complete waste of time.
His claims have been so thoroughly debunked here and elsewhere that any further consideration is a waste of everyone's time.