MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Strider]

Man you people kill me...every time someone disagrees with evolution they always have to get accused of being ignorant of the theory..."you just don't know what evolution is....you just don't understand it", as if the theory of evolution is this secret society and only those that believe in it can fully understand what is...bullshit.

We don't believe in evolution, not because of what we don't understand, we don't believe in evolution because of what we DO understand....and with respect to Mr. Hovind, the man has a longggg history of debating evolutionists, and he actually debated three evolutionists at one time...and during his lectures, he actually quotes and uses illustrations from actual biology books, right there on the projector screen, for all to see. So in the video, it isn't as if he is willing to have his beliefs challenged, he was actually out there on the forefront willing to debate anyone on the theory, and has debated many evolutionists, from the likes of Massimo Pigluicci, to Kenneth Miller, to Eugenie Scott.

So you can say what you want about Mr. Hovind, but you can't ever accuse him of getting his ass handed to him in any debate on the subject of evolution...but the same can't be said for the evolutionist that he's debated.

You act like Hovnid has added credibility because he debated three evolutionists at once; it doesn't. All his willingness to debate shows is that he believes in the river of bullshit he vomits.

During his presentations, he shows illustrations and segments of biology books? Is this supposed to be impressive? We do the same fucking thing with bible verses here and theists casually dismiss those. Are we supposed to "oooo" and "aaaah" at his weaksauce attempts to purposefully misrepresent and distort textbooks to fit his twisted version of events?

Just to be clear, Hovind is a raving psychotic. He readily dismisses available evidence because it won't fit into his juvenile, fantasy view of reality. It's already been mentioned several times, but he is also a felon - a guy who has been convicted of defrauding the IRS, mail fraud, obstruction and impeding tax laws, and other crimes. Do you not think that a guy willing to lie and break the law would be above lying and distorting the truth about anything else?

Damn, take the blinders off already.