RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm
(This post was last modified: December 20, 2014 at 12:28 pm by abaris.)
(December 20, 2014 at 12:21 pm)robvalue Wrote: I honestly don't know if people are just too lazy to open up Wikipedia and read for 5 minutes, or whether they just aren't interested in learning. Or they read, but it goes through a "theist filter". This applies to the professional dishonesters too.
Being a lefty when it comes to politics, I mostly take my information from what the Americans call liberal channels and papers. But I also look at the conservative take on the topic, in case I had missed some important information.
They take the same approach when it comes to evolution. They look at what their fellow apologists have to say on it, but they leave out step two, the cross checking.
(December 20, 2014 at 12:25 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: No, the text book is what is full of lies.