MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[His_Majesty]

You act like Hovnid has added credibility because he debated three evolutionists at once; it doesn't.

Dude, when he went against those three evolutionists, that was one of the worse intellectual spankings I've ever seen.

During his presentations, he shows illustrations and segments of biology books? Is this supposed to be impressive? We do the same fucking thing with bible verses here and theists casually dismiss those.

No shit. My point was some people on here are making it seem as if Hovind doesn't know what the hell evolution is or he is making up his own version of evolution, and I am just pointing out that this can't be the case since he is actually using text books and EXPLAINING why he believes it is false.

Of all the debates I've seen him in, no one has ever accused him of being ignorant of the issues...they may accuse him of being WRONG in his interpretation and vice versa, but he doesn't get accused of being ignorant or misinformed.

Just to be clear, Hovind is a raving psychotic. He readily dismisses available evidence

He has ever right to dismiss evidence that he thinks is insufficient...kinda reminds me of atheists, right?

I don't know where you get the idea that only atheists can dismiss evidence...Creationists can do it too.

a guy who has been convicted of defrauding the IRS, mail fraud, obstruction and impeding tax laws, and other crimes.

Mike Tyson was convicted of rape, but that doesn't mean he wasn't a damn good boxer in his prime.

Do you not think that a guy willing to lie and break the law would be above lying and distorting the truth about anything else?

Judge not lest ye be judged (Matthew 7:1). Hovind also points out lies in the text books, too. So how about you try to reconcile those lies?

Damn, take the blinders off already.

Blinders my ass, heaven is the destination.