MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Free]

And how does any of this in anyway demonstrate proof that Jesus was a myth? It does absolutely nothing. It proves nothing. It is just another smoke and mirror Mythicist argument.

Will you continue to copy and paste those pathetic arguments?

Who do you think made up Jesus this all ties in and its full circle.

Do you understand the difference between a persuasive argument and actual tangible evidence?

Here are the definitions:

Persuasive Writing:

Persuasive writing, is a piece of work in which the writer uses words to convince the reader that the writer's opinion is correct in regards to an issue. Persuasive writing sometimes involves persuading the reader to perform an action, or it may simply consist of an argument or several arguments to align the reader with the writer’s point of view.

That is what you are attempting to do above, and the argument above is not persuasive at all.

Now here is what tangible evidence is:

Tangible Evidence:

Tangible Evidence is an evidence which can be treated as fact; real or concrete. It is capable of being touched or felt and have a real substance, a tangible object.

That is what you need to do.

You are providing a very poorly scripted persuasive argument and confusing it with tangible evidence.

Decisions are made on the evidence, not on poorly scripted persuasive arguments.