Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 28, 2024, 4:12 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 21, 2014 at 3:14 am)His_Majesty Wrote: That is your false assertion.
It's what your scripture says.

Quote:See my response from an earlier post.
You offered a flimsy rationalization to make your scripture say what you want it to say instead of what's there.

Quote:Nor is it the argument that you and your wife is the same person. You both are human, right? You both have human nature, right? How many human natures do you have? One, or two? The answer is ONE...there is only one human nature that you both have, but you are two different people, right?
Two people, yes.

Three separate beings with a divine nature = 3 gods.

Your use of the word "God" means "a pantheon".

Three gods in your pantheon.

Polytheism.

Quote:It is a title.

A pantheon shared by three beings. Three gods. Polytheism.

Quote:Now we are getting more deep into the subject of morality, save this for another post.
You brought it up. But fine.

Quote:Well, that just about sums up my entire tenure here.
Indeed.

Quote:I've already explained why that is the case and you've yet to respond to that.
No, you haven't. "You lost".





Quote:I gave the example at least three times and you didn't respond to the shit...I mean, it aint the best analogy in the world but you can at least address it instead of blatantly ignoring it and then typing the same crap as if it hasn't been addressed yet.
Because your analogy is completely a red herring. These are three separate beings, no matter how they decide to play together.

Three beings that are divine = three gods = polytheism.

Quote:If you don't understand how the nature/title of God can be applied to three persons, then I can't help you.

Sorry but you don't get to redefine words.

Even if you did, your redefinition doesn't magically turn 3 into 1.

Using the word "God" to mean your "pantheon" doesn't change that you are a polytheist.

Quote:The concept isn't that they share the same being. See, that right there just shows you don't even understand the concept.
Do tell.

Quote:If the Father is standing 50 feet to your left, the Son 50 feet in front of you, and the Holy Spirit 50 feet to your right...you see three individuals, right? Three separate beings...and all three of these beings share the same EQUAL essence of "God".

Right, three beings that are divine = three gods = polytheism.

Quote:Now what part of that don't you understand??
Your special math that makes 3 equal to 1.

Quote:If you don't know how it originated how in the hell do you know that the brain is involved?
We gain sensory input and process it in the brain. We determine what the sensory inputs mean in the brain. We store memory in the brain. We access memory through the brain. We feel emotions in the brain. Our earthly desires are the result of hormones interacting with the brain. When the brain is damaged, our nature changes accordingly. What part of our conscious experience occurs outside the brain and what evidence can you offer to prove that?

Quote:Straw man.
No. You were the one who spoke of your "flesh side". There is no such thing. There is no invisible version of you on your shoulder with horns and a tail saying "fuck her". Science understands what hormones are. It's a better explanation than your woo.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) - by DeistPaladin - December 21, 2014 at 1:23 pm
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Exian - December 12, 2014 at 12:34 am
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Spooky - December 14, 2014 at 12:01 am
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 1:48 pm
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Part 2) - by Cato - December 14, 2014 at 3:45 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 50 2331 January 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Last Post: no one
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4620 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 8093 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3203 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3386 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1483 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3551 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2859 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16039 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2061 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)