RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 4:03 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(December 21, 2014 at 3:43 pm)Brucer Wrote: He doesn't need me to poison any well. He poisoned it himself the moment he opened his mouth.
Anyone who uses honest skepticism sees right through his arguments.
You atheists- who propagate reason and rationale religiously- should be utterly ashamed of yourselves for allowing your anti-Christian bias to influence your opinions to such a point as that you are quite willing to crucify reason and rationale by intentionally refusing to acknowledge the almost innumerable logical fallacies Ken Humphreys employs on his website.
I often wonder if the hatred of religion can take the atheistic mind so far as to castrate skepticism in favor of a strap-on commonly known as denialism.
If you think Humpherys has a single rational argument supported with tangible evidence, bring it here.
Hey look, turns out he needed a whole lot more well poison!
And this isn't poisoning the well against me?
