RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:24 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 1:07 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: So "Godhead" is a funny way of saying "Trinity" then. Why didn't you just say so?
Either way, it was defined for you.
(December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Beside my point. My point is that sharing attributes doesn't make you the same being.
Again, the Trinity doctrine is not a concept of the three sharing the same "being". I keep stressing that point and you keep going right back to it...which make me believe that you either lack reading comprehension skills, or you are just being disingenuous...either way, this is my last post to you regarding this topic...no where in any of our exchanges have I ever presented the Trinity doctrine the way that you present it, so you are basically attacking a position that I never argued, implied, or even hinted
(December 20, 2014 at 1:33 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: So "God" is simply a title and not a type of being like everyone else uses the word to mean.
See dictionary.com's definition of "God", nowhere does "it's just a title" appear in the definition of "God".
It is a title which represents who he is and it can sometimes be used synonymously as a name for the "Father". But either way, I am through with you on this subject.
