RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 5:34 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 5:36 pm by Free.)
(December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(December 21, 2014 at 5:13 pm)Brucer Wrote: No. I didn't poison the well, at least not in regards to the original accuation from Stmbo, which was part of what you quoted.
It is not poisoning the well to observe someone who's skepticism appears to be dishonest, since it is not pre-emptive.
It is not poisoning the well when observations of anti-Christian bias pre-empt my comments regarding it.
It is not poisoning the well when observations of a hatred of religion pre-empt my comments regarding it.
So, essentially it's not poisoning the well if you're right, which we've already established you could not possibly be as you don't know the people you're accusing of bias.
You think I cannot read the anti-Christian rhetoric on this forum? I cannot see the bias in the words that are expressed? I'm somehow blind to the disgust many atheists here have towards religions?
Do I really need to research the forum in it's entirety and bring out 10 quotes of specific people who display such behavior? Or, would it be suffice to say that one of your prolific posters pointed that out herself just a few pages back?
Please don't preach to me about "intellectual honesty." I'm not seeing much of that in your posts to me.
