RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 10:48 am
(December 22, 2014 at 10:41 am)Spooky Wrote:(December 22, 2014 at 10:37 am)Brucer Wrote: So, I should view that as some kind of "religion?" I get teh exact same treatment on a Muslim forum, so how do you think this being an "atheist" forum is any different than a religious forum?
So far here, I have been treated exactly the same why I get treated on forums from various religions.
One would think an "atheist" forum would set a higher standard, but so far ... that is planets away from the truth.
That will not matter. What matters is the impression this forum gives to theists, and when I see posts of endless insults, and also posts demonstrating exceptional hatred (as I pointed out earlier), what do you think the value is of what I lose?
So Jack jumped off the bridge means John should jump too?
1. You're wrong.
2. You're wrong because your primary religious text is complete garbage.
3. It's likely I know the bible better than you.
4. Insults not required.
None of this is relative to my post. Completely non sequitur.
And as far as what you think you know about me and the bible or religious history in general, my formal education is history, with strong emphasis on religious history. Although that is not what I do for a living.
Quote:You should expect an "Atheist Forum" to not fall over itself to let you spin the same line of bs that I'm sure hundreds before you did, and hundreds after you will. Make a statement, accept feedback, make a new statement or defend your previous one. At this point you're simply being redundant.
You think i am proselytizing? Show me where.
