RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 12:56 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 12:00 pm)robvalue Wrote: It depends entirely on who you ask [what a god is]. Everyone has their own definition.
We learned that with HM. To him, "god" is a title of a jointly held organization, like shares in a company. Thus, he semantically evades the label "polytheist" only by redefining what a god is.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
