RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 3:32 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Second, if what you present is the rule then why wasn't it merged earlier? It should have been merged from the moment part 2 was posted, but you all waited until dozens of pages in before you decided to take action.
That decision was based upon one god deciding that this should be the case, and the other gods hopping on the bandwagon.
There's actually a much more reasonable answer: we aren't allowed to use our mod powers on our own, our internal rules require that we vote on a proposed ruling before it's implemented. So the motion to merge your threads was put up for a vote, and given that we're people living all across the world, in a multitude of different time zones, it takes time to get the required number of votes, more if we wish to debate the issue before coming to a conclusion.
For all your squawking about us being gods, the real story is that we actually decided to think about merging your threads before we did it. So sorry that giving your posts due consideration before moving on them offends you so.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!