I've never seen where the Dawkins scale requires integers so
I'm asymptotically up against 7 even for the logically inconsistent gods (the self contradictory omnigods).
I can't get to 7 on those because, though they contradict logic, and though I
can't conceive of a system in which the logic we know does not hold, I can
conceive of the possible existence of a system of which I cannot conceive, one where
our normal logic doesn't apply, e.g. A and notA are simultaneously true for some A.
I know my "religious views" above show only 6.99999999 (or roughly one chance in seven hundred million,
(a slightly lower liklihood than winning Powerball on a single ticket)) but I only use that figure to avoid filling the screen with 9s.
I'm asymptotically up against 7 even for the logically inconsistent gods (the self contradictory omnigods).
I can't get to 7 on those because, though they contradict logic, and though I
can't conceive of a system in which the logic we know does not hold, I can
conceive of the possible existence of a system of which I cannot conceive, one where
our normal logic doesn't apply, e.g. A and notA are simultaneously true for some A.
I know my "religious views" above show only 6.99999999 (or roughly one chance in seven hundred million,
(a slightly lower liklihood than winning Powerball on a single ticket)) but I only use that figure to avoid filling the screen with 9s.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? 
