RE: [split] Agnostic atheism is the only intellectually honest position
July 29, 2010 at 2:13 pm
Philosophically, no God can ever be disproved. That's the problem with Religion, it's one big philosophical puzzle and as such will never have final answers.
I consider myself a Militant Anti-Theist. Not only do I say no god, I also feel all religion should be squashed down to personal belief level and that's it. Remove all religion from public realm. No tax breaks, no political clout, nothing!
There is enough evidence for me to say no God. From similarities to hundreds of other dismissed gods and the many contradictions between the current gods, it all dwindles down to no god. There is nothing intelligent about our design either. The human body has many flaws that prove no perfect god could exist. The concept of free will vs innocent victims of crimes proves no perfect god could exist. Natural disasters and their victims prove no perfect god could exist. Disease and abnormalities prove no perfect god could exist. I could go on for a long time. So, yes, there is enough evidence for me to say "ABSOLUTELY 100% NO GOD".
If we have a doctor who can't help us heal or cure anything, would we continue to believe in his abilities? We don't need much evidence to prove he sucks. So why do we need a lot evidence to prove a perfect god doesn't exist? He hasn't done squat since the day he was thought up and I'd say that's enough proof.
I consider myself a Militant Anti-Theist. Not only do I say no god, I also feel all religion should be squashed down to personal belief level and that's it. Remove all religion from public realm. No tax breaks, no political clout, nothing!
There is enough evidence for me to say no God. From similarities to hundreds of other dismissed gods and the many contradictions between the current gods, it all dwindles down to no god. There is nothing intelligent about our design either. The human body has many flaws that prove no perfect god could exist. The concept of free will vs innocent victims of crimes proves no perfect god could exist. Natural disasters and their victims prove no perfect god could exist. Disease and abnormalities prove no perfect god could exist. I could go on for a long time. So, yes, there is enough evidence for me to say "ABSOLUTELY 100% NO GOD".
If we have a doctor who can't help us heal or cure anything, would we continue to believe in his abilities? We don't need much evidence to prove he sucks. So why do we need a lot evidence to prove a perfect god doesn't exist? He hasn't done squat since the day he was thought up and I'd say that's enough proof.
