I have always seen one fundamental flaw in one of the MOST common believer's argument against evolution. They site, for example, if a tornado were to blow a rubbhist junk of material ,what is the chance of a Boeing747 being created from it.
In essense, they say some random mass of pile of things End up being something as complex and organised as a human has negligible chance.
Dawkins argue that which Mutations are random, evolution is not.
However this borders on begging the question. It assumes evolution exist in the first place.
I tell you all one fundamental flaw with this believers argument, and you atheist help structure it into a proper reasoning. Somehow, I am stuck at being able to progress.
The fundamental flaw is, if we were to believe in the believers' reasoning, then Whatever, no matter what outcome, will be rejected by them.
Say there is a box containing one million different poker cards. You are to draw one. The believers logic will then argue that there is only one in a million chance you could have drawn that, hence it cannot be true. However, the situation can be for real obviously.
So say after the Earth is formed. Evolution does not take place and 1 billion years later still ends up in a pile of mess. The believer's logic will have to contradict too, why is it this mess out of a possible 1 thrillion other mess. It cannot be true.
My Logic has not ben fully developed but there is some logic in it. You guys develope one for me and us.
In essense, they say some random mass of pile of things End up being something as complex and organised as a human has negligible chance.
Dawkins argue that which Mutations are random, evolution is not.
However this borders on begging the question. It assumes evolution exist in the first place.
I tell you all one fundamental flaw with this believers argument, and you atheist help structure it into a proper reasoning. Somehow, I am stuck at being able to progress.
The fundamental flaw is, if we were to believe in the believers' reasoning, then Whatever, no matter what outcome, will be rejected by them.
Say there is a box containing one million different poker cards. You are to draw one. The believers logic will then argue that there is only one in a million chance you could have drawn that, hence it cannot be true. However, the situation can be for real obviously.
So say after the Earth is formed. Evolution does not take place and 1 billion years later still ends up in a pile of mess. The believer's logic will have to contradict too, why is it this mess out of a possible 1 thrillion other mess. It cannot be true.
My Logic has not ben fully developed but there is some logic in it. You guys develope one for me and us.
