(January 13, 2015 at 1:02 am)Alex K Wrote:Indeed the translators/commentators in "The Presocratic Philosophers" add: "We may rather praise [Empedocles] as the first thinker to see that biology needs both randomness and principles of organization in its exploratory equipment."(January 12, 2015 at 11:55 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: The rest of the quote I have goes:
"Hence Empedocles was wrong in saying that many attributes belong to animals because it happened so in their coming to be, for instance that their backbone is such because it happened to get broken by bending."
:-|
Well this makes it more concrete, so it is very useful context to make *any sense* of the first statement. What we can say for sure is that, indeed, empedocles was wrong here concerning.the details, but more correct than aristoteles: animals are indeed the way they are because "it" (natural selection) happened so in their coming to be. However, I get the feeling that precise meanings of words matter here...
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza