Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 3:09 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Churches oppose three-person baby plan

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Churches oppose three-person baby plan
Losty Offline
LastPoet’s jerkoff #4
*****
Religious Views: Pastafarian
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation: 185
#9
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan
January 30, 2015 at 7:13 pm
(January 30, 2015 at 7:10 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Mitochondria are believed to have been free living life forms eons ago, and then were symbiotically assimilated by other life forms.

Human fathers don't contribute mitochondria to offspring, only mothers. Also, mitochondrial DNA can be separately sequenced to learn about our ancestors.

Mitochondria are our cells energy producers.

Now see that's cool to know. I only knew they're the squiggly beans. They are the squiggly ones right?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Churches oppose three-person baby plan

Messages In This Thread
Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:45 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 6:48 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - February 3, 2015 at 9:14 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:52 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 6:54 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - January 30, 2015 at 6:59 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:08 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nope - January 30, 2015 at 7:18 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nope - January 30, 2015 at 7:02 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 7:10 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:13 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Cyberman - January 30, 2015 at 7:25 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - January 30, 2015 at 7:27 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Lucanus - January 30, 2015 at 7:34 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Nine - January 30, 2015 at 7:51 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 8:10 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by c172 - January 30, 2015 at 8:18 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - January 30, 2015 at 8:19 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Cyberman - January 30, 2015 at 8:22 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Minimalist - January 30, 2015 at 9:06 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Regina - February 2, 2015 at 11:23 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by FreeTony - February 2, 2015 at 11:43 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Aisha - February 3, 2015 at 6:44 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Radco - February 3, 2015 at 8:15 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Aisha - February 3, 2015 at 8:17 am
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - February 3, 2015 at 2:12 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by zebo-the-fat - February 3, 2015 at 2:22 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by JesusHChrist - February 3, 2015 at 2:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - February 3, 2015 at 2:30 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by Losty - February 3, 2015 at 2:45 pm
RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan - by vorlon13 - February 3, 2015 at 2:50 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  On the consciousness of a new born baby Macoleco 8 1101 April 7, 2022 at 7:22 am
Last Post: brewer
  The HIV plan brewer 2 377 February 7, 2019 at 2:22 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Human baby gene editing is here? brewer 9 1380 November 29, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  "The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born" Heat 218 22255 December 14, 2015 at 9:18 pm
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Baby raccoons IATIA 7 1799 November 23, 2015 at 12:28 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Next-Gen Test Tube Baby Born pineapplebunnybounce 4 2576 July 12, 2013 at 4:46 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce
  ‘Adventurous’ Woman Needed as Surrogate for Neanderthal Baby TaraJo 25 8900 January 29, 2013 at 2:40 am
Last Post: Cinjin
  About a baby gamerguy86 6 2353 June 23, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: gamerguy86
  All part of gods great plan. Zen Badger 15 5027 February 11, 2012 at 9:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Orangutan helping out a baby bird. downbeatplumb 13 4240 June 19, 2011 at 12:59 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)