RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan
January 30, 2015 at 7:25 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2015 at 7:30 pm by Cyberman.)
As if the church opinion on this has any relevance whatsoever. If they want to insist in intervening in scientific matters, then perhaps they should be equally insistent in allowing science to intervene in religious ones.
To me, this is little more than a desperate attempt to make the church seem pertinent to modern society. Look at the pig-ignorance in the following article:
To me, this is little more than a desperate attempt to make the church seem pertinent to modern society. Look at the pig-ignorance in the following article:
The Torygraph Wrote:Scientists have accused the church leaders of refusing to examine overwhelming evidence which shows that the creation of three parent babies is ethical and safe.
The Anglican and Catholic churches have both warned that it would irresponsible for MPs to pass new laws allowing the DNA of a ‘second mother’ to be used to repair genetic faults in an unborn child.
They have called for more scientific evidence to prove that the child will not inherit characteristics from the donor DNA.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
