RE: Churches oppose three-person baby plan
January 30, 2015 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2015 at 7:38 pm by Lucanus.)
How the fuck would the replacement of mithochondria (which I didn't know about and is hella cool) be unethical? What, will they say that mitochondria are the seat of the soul?
Btw, why have a third person intervene? Couldn't they take the mitochondria from the father's white blood cells?
Edit: I just now realized that they meant mitochondrial DNA replacement. Well, whatever.
Btw, why have a third person intervene? Couldn't they take the mitochondria from the father's white blood cells?
Edit: I just now realized that they meant mitochondrial DNA replacement. Well, whatever.
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
