RE: Agnostic: a pointless term?
January 31, 2015 at 12:29 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2015 at 12:47 pm by IATIA.)
(January 31, 2015 at 12:25 pm)YGninja Wrote: ... evidence is anything which can be used to support a position, and there is plenty of that in the case of God.Nuh uh!
(January 31, 2015 at 12:29 pm)YGninja Wrote: ... they can get away with producing absolutely no argument against Gods existence.We have multitudes of arguments against god's existence. However, there is no fully defined description of this god, so during the course of each argument, the definition of the god changes to account for the anomalies.
Can you even provide us with a formal absolute definition of your god? NO, you cannot. Even as you try to define your god, you will see the holes in your definition. If you do define your god, it will be vague with statements to the effect, "We cannot know" or "It is the mystery of god" or "Faith is required by god", but you cannot come up with a definition of your god.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
