RE: Agnostic: a pointless term?
February 3, 2015 at 1:21 pm
(This post was last modified: February 3, 2015 at 1:33 pm by Creed of Heresy.)
(February 3, 2015 at 12:04 pm)YGninja Wrote:(February 2, 2015 at 4:11 pm)wiploc Wrote: We're done here.
.
So you're never going to respond to these major points? I guess we are done, i accept your forfeiture.
I am a hard-line atheist. 7 on the Dawkins scale, I outright know for a fucking fact no gods exist.
Wanna know how I know? Because after 10,000+ attempts at the God Hypothesis being disproven, you have to eventually come to realize that the hypothesis is fundamentally wrong.
I know there are no gods like I know there are no unicorns. You can dance around and get into the semantics of "BUT YOU DON'T KNOW ABSOLUTELY!"
Yes. Yes I fucking do. My mind is completely concluded. I know for a damn fact no evidence for a god will ever come about, because over the course of humanity's existence, gods have been nothing more than the subject of imaginary stories used by those who had no other qualities that made them worthy of leadership other than the ability to lie to the illiterate to be rulers over the masses.
You can be agnostic if you want. But to me, an agnostic is simply an atheist who still entertains the possibility of something that never had any possibility to begin with. An agnostic is an atheist who is still dithering hesitantly.
All the proof you should need is the absolute total and utter lack of proof. The burden of proof is on the claimant. They have none. Ergo, there is no god, there are no gods, there never have been any gods, and there never will be any gods.