Challenge For Theists

[Drich]

Nope. None of that follows.

follows what? I simply said as with any indivisual the best proof of the indivisual is the indivisual themselves. How does that not follow? Or is that just a stock atheist answer you all don't really think about and just assume it applies to everything?

God, who's existence can't be proven is not a proof of anything, let alone of itself. Thinking in circles is not logic...

Neither is an arguement from ignorance.
Argument from ignorance (appeal to ignorance, argumentum ad ignorantiam) – assuming that a claim is true because it has not been or cannot be proven false, or vice versa.

Your arguement only works if you presume that God does not exist and anything provided is not proof of anything.

I have continually said if one seeks God as He commands He will show up. In that one has proof of God.

---

God is the proof of God that can't be used to proove the existence of other deities.

Think about it it's like someone asking what proof of nope/you that isn't proof of someone else? You are that proof. Why would the same not be true with God?

Thor is the proof of Thor that can't be used to prove the existence of other deities.

If someone asked me to prove that I am the real Nope, I would show them identification forms like my birth certificate and drivers license. My husband and I have been married 26 years so he would be my character witness. I have multiple friends and family who could vouch for my being the real deal. Also, a DNA test would be the final proof.

So you agree the best proof of Nope is Nope?

Because without out nope none of the stuff you mentioned exists.

---

Not what I said in any way shape or form. Never once did I mention the bible. I said as with anyone else, the best proof of God is of God Himself.

So then the proof that god doesn't exist is his inexistence itself.

How can Inexistence and existence coexist?