(February 10, 2015 at 9:27 am)Norman Humann Wrote:(February 10, 2015 at 9:02 am)Drich Wrote: Actually your not.I'm not? If I'm not mistaken, you said that God is the proof of his existence. So his inexistence is also the proof for itself.
Your committing a formal fallacy:
Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[8]
Also, you're wrong and the proof is the fact that you're wrong. That's what your logic sounds like.
Sounds about right for Drich.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson