(February 10, 2015 at 9:27 am)Norman Humann Wrote:(February 10, 2015 at 9:02 am)Drich Wrote: Actually your not.I'm not?
Your committing a formal fallacy:
Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[8]
No no, your not. You know, that "not" you own.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'