Ken Ham petulantly stamps his feet at reality, internet replies, "this is stupid."

[Esquilax]

He's an insipid man-child?

Yes.

What like...
Atheists demand stop to nativity scenes at Christmas?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/12/...t-threats/

Like atheists reminding the government that they need to obey the law? The precedent is there: either all religious views get a space, or none do. What this really is, is a bunch of christians arguing that they should be able to violate the constitution whenever they want; I agree it's not an amazingly important issue, but history shows that if we give theists an inch they'll take a yard. Look to your own side's sense of entitlement before you start pointing fingers.

Atheists demand apology after video sent out by chancellor highlighting importance of religion in a democracy?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...54365.html

Oh, you mean the one that starkly implied that if you aren't religious, you're immoral and prone to criminality? Can't imagine what would be offensive in there. You do seem in love with only telling half the story, don't you?

Atheists demand removal of religious painting at school?
http://toprightnews.com/?p=6348

Again, establishment clause. You're trying to call us petty for wanting your side to obey the law; I think that says more about you and your underhanded misrepresentations than it does about the contents of the atheist movement.

Not to mention, your entire argument here is one giant tu coque fallacy. Good job, Mr Cogent.