RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 10, 2015 at 11:43 pm
(February 10, 2015 at 11:34 pm)YGninja Wrote:(February 10, 2015 at 11:08 pm)Cato Wrote: Esquilax fairly represented WLC's arguments. All you have to do is look up WLC on YouTube.
Like WLC you can dismiss challenges with smug indifference, but this in no way refute the argument. "Just stop it" is not an argument.
I've watched WLC's debates and hence i know the OP has grossly misrepresented him. "Just stop it", is not an argument, its a request.
Honestly, from what I've seen, all the standard arguments for God employed by WLC are arguments from ignorance or God of the gaps.
He's still an entertaining debater regardless.