RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 9:35 am
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2015 at 9:38 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(February 11, 2015 at 12:53 am)Esquilax Wrote: Yes, in that the premise merely asserts the existence of a second category (things that didn't begin to exist) without demonstrating it.Esq. cannot grasp the idea that some things about reality are fundamental, as opposed to contingent. It's an absurdist and nihilistic position that he refuses to acknowledge.