RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 4:32 pm
I went to see WLC at Rutgers last week. Interesting talk. While you dismiss out of hand the Kalam argument, he spoke for 2 hours defending each premise.
For example, you say that it's just his assertion that there are two categories 1) things that begin to exist and 2) things that don't begin to exist. He went on at some length defend the premise that there cannot be a past infinity so therefore we can conclude that there is at least one thing that did not begin to exist.
For example, you say that it's just his assertion that there are two categories 1) things that begin to exist and 2) things that don't begin to exist. He went on at some length defend the premise that there cannot be a past infinity so therefore we can conclude that there is at least one thing that did not begin to exist.
