RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 4:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2015 at 5:00 pm by Pizza.)
(February 11, 2015 at 4:46 pm)robvalue Wrote: The Kalam is one of the worst arguments on record.The only charitable way to interpret it is as a first step in a bigger chain of argument.
Doesn't even indicate a sentient being.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate a god.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate any particular god.
Also, its premises are bullshit.
So all in all, 0/10.
Part one being to prove the existence of a first/final cause (sometimes defined as an explanation) then part two is to prove the first/final cause is identical to a God. Part three would be to prove that God is identical to the Christian God. This is all one tall order and hard to pull off.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
