RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 5:34 pm
(February 11, 2015 at 5:16 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote:(February 11, 2015 at 5:06 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Could you be more dishonest? We've been discussing it for YEARS. It's dismissed because it isn't demonstrably sound.Even if sound it doesn't automatically lead to any deity at all. The first cause could be just an impersonal thing.
The problem is most apologists will jump to the conclusion that a first/final cause is identical to the Christian God without arguing for it first. That makes those versions of KCA invalid.
Oh no! I'm sure WLC makes a compelling case that the great magical collector of foreskins (and former Canaanite deity), Yahweh, is precisely the cause the argument postulates. And I'm sure WLC's water boy, SteveII, will be supplying that case any moment now.
But just in case I'm wrong, I won't hold my breath.
