RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 5:40 pm
(February 11, 2015 at 4:46 pm)robvalue Wrote: The Kalam is one of the worst arguments on record.
Doesn't even indicate a sentient being.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate a god.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate any particular god.
Also, its premises are bullshit.
So all in all, 0/10.
That took me all of 30 seconds, what the fuck was he talking about for 2 hours and why was anyone listening?
It goes beyond that. There are so many things wrong with the argument that they're almost too numerous to list. It's one of those arguments that does nothing but make believers feel better about themselves.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
