RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 6:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2015 at 6:52 pm by Jackalope.)
(February 11, 2015 at 6:30 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(February 11, 2015 at 6:23 pm)SteveII Wrote: How could a first cause be anything but an intentional act?
Do you have anything but a fallacious argument from ignorance?
Let me make this perfectly clear, in the event that subtlety whistled past your ears.
It's your claim. You don't get to play the ignorant fool and try to shift the burden of proof. It's your claim, you don't get to merely assert that no other alternative exists, nor is it up to anyone else to counterclaim it. You made the claim - you a can attempt to demonstrate it, or it can be summarily dismissed.
You want to ship that turd of an argument? You pay the fucking freight.
Incidentally, I don't buy WLC's argument against past infinities, either - and it's clear that he doesn't either, not without special pleading, due to carving out a special exception for his uncaused, timeless skydaddy.
