RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 8:29 pm
(February 11, 2015 at 6:23 pm)SteveII Wrote:Because it's a paradoxical statement. Intention implies existence of an agent capable of intention. Therefore the "first cause" would be whatever is responsible for the existent of that agent.(February 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Asserted without evidence.
How could a first cause be anything but an intentional act?