RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 12, 2015 at 1:09 am
(February 12, 2015 at 12:26 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: It's not ambiguous at all - put yourself in his shoes, according to what he believes, there is exactly one thing in the set of things that began to exist ex nihilo, and the set of things he's comparing that to are all ex materia. Not only is he equivocating, he's committing the fallacy of composition, as noted by another poster before me.
Even if we grant WLC a fair amount of latitude, the argument is wholly fallacious.
It's a shitty argument.
Also the thing is and i have said that the person with the claim using that logic has to apply it to a god and since god is not physical and no one know what he is made off there for no god.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>