(August 15, 2010 at 2:24 pm)RAD Wrote: "I dunno. I never read it, but I know it anyway."
(August 14, 2010 at 8:44 pm)LEDO Wrote: I am an atheist who has read the Bible and written several books on the topic. Now if you want a 20 second soundbite to win any debate, okay here goes. Start with the OT story of creation. Either the snake talked or it didn't. Either the earth is 6,000 years old or it isn't. Pretty simple. If they claim the snake talked and a young earth, you should be able to laugh them out of the room. If they claim it is just a parable, then use the fundie debate. If there was no real fall of man, if it was just a parable, then why does man need to be redeemed? There is no need for Jesus. It is a lose-lose situation for any Christian.
Major logical fallacy! "False in one part therefore false in all."
Come on. This is laughable logic Ledo I would stop writing books immediately until you stop using and selling such nonsense. Go read Durant's rationale and try to refute that if you want to appear knowlegeable.
Apparently you have never read the Christian arguments. Either the entire Bible is true, or it is not. They claim if any part of it is false, then it is not a book of God. If we assume the beginning is false, that there was no fall of man, then all of Christinaity is false because it is based entirely on the idea there was a fall and man needs to be saved. They also claim the entire Bible is geared towards man salvation and the coming of the messiah. Hence the whole Bible is false based on their logic, not Durant. Unless you have read my books, don't be critical of them.
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.